Humanity in Ecority

The need for an ontological repositioning

Being human in an age defined by anthropocentrism, where human concerns and perspectives dominate, is increasingly complex and contentious. Marked by a singular focus on human priorities and experiences, the realities surrounding us are forcing us to challenge traditional definitions of humanity, demanding a reevaluation of our place within the biosphere and our relationships with the 'more-than-human' world.

To be a sentient human today involves exercising wisdom in order to grapple with the tensions between self-perception and environmental responsibility. Historically, human exceptionalism—emphasizing what we assumed to be the uniqueness of human cognition, morality, and culture—justified dominion over the natural world. This mindset led to remarkable advancements but also caused environmental degradation, species extinction, and profound ecological imbalances. It can no longer be trusted. The anthropocentric perspective prioritizes human needs and desires, often at the expense of other species and ecosystems. The centrality of humanitarianism that's ingrained in modern economic and cultural systems, is bound to be increasingly scrutinized as its detrimental consequences become evident.

The anthropocentric age necessitates a critical reflection on the notion of humanity. Are we genuinely distinct from other life forms, or merely one species among many, subject to the same ecological laws and ethical considerations? The growing recognition of the intrinsic value of non-human life forms and our interdependence with the natural world challenges the notion of human exceptionalism. This realization compels a reassessment of the moral and philosophical foundations of our actions and their impacts on each other and the planet.

Moreover, the anthropocentric lens profoundly shapes our understanding of progress and development. The relentless pursuit of technological and economic advancement often overlooks ecological costs and ethical implications. As human activity drives climate change and environmental degradation—in spite of ongoing denial by some—the concept of progress must be redefined to consider the planet's health and the well-being of all its inhabitants. This redefinition requires acknowledging our shared vulnerability and the interconnectedness between human flourishing and environmental health.

Our relationship with technology also profoundly impacts the ethical dimensions of being human today. Advances in artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and related fields blur the boundaries between human and non-human entities, raising questions about autonomy, consciousness, and the nature of life. As we develop technologies that replicate or enhance certain human abilities, we must address the implications for our identity and the moral considerations of such innovations. The anthropocentric perspective, which previously justified technological progress as a means to elevate human experience, now faces the challenge of integrating these advancements into a broader framework that respects all life forms.

Being human in this age often involves navigating the legacy of human exceptionalism while confronting ecological and ethical realities. The anthropocentric worldview and its underlying humanitarian ontology are deeply entangled, yet both are increasingly challenged by perspectives advocating a more inclusive and holistic understanding of humanity’s place in the world. Integrating these perspectives into our conceptions of progress, ethics, and identity is imperative, recognizing that the health and well-being of all life forms are interconnected and mutually reinforcing.

Redefining how humans relate to the "more-than-human" world is essential. This world includes not only the biosphere but also non-human animals, plants, and other living and non-living entities that form the intricate web of life. Our relationship with this world should shift from a hierarchical, dominion-based perspective to one of interdependence, respect, and responsibility.

Embracing an ethic of interdependence involves recognizing that humans are deeply embedded within the natural world. The health and vitality of human societies are linked to the well-being of ecosystems and non-human life forms. This understanding calls for a reorientation of our practices and policies, emphasizing material sufficiency and ecological balance over exploitation and short-term gain.

To relate effectively to the more-than-human world, humans must cultivate respect for the intrinsic value of non-human entities. This respect extends beyond their utility to humans and acknowledges their right to exist and thrive independently. Philosophical frameworks such as deep ecology and biocentrism advocate for placing the well-being of all life forms at the core of decision-making processes.

This respect can be manifested through sustainable practices that minimize ecological harm, protect biodiversity, and foster conservation. For example, preserving natural habitats, rewilding, and mitigating climate change are crucial for species survival and ecological balance. Ethical considerations should guide agricultural practices, urban development, and resource management to prevent the exploitation and degradation of non-human life.

A transformative approach also involves recognizing the agency and experiences of non-human entities. Understanding that animals, plants, and ecosystems possess their own forms of agency and sentience challenges anthropocentric assumptions and calls for a more empathetic view of their lives.

Furthermore, humans should build reciprocal relationships with the more-than-human world, emphasizing mutual benefit and respect. Indigenous and traditional ecological knowledge offers valuable insights into harmonious living with nature, emphasizing stewardship, reciprocity, and balance. Learning from these perspectives can inform contemporary approaches to environmental ethics and conservation.

Education and awareness are crucial for fostering a harmonious relationship with the more-than-human world. A deeper understanding of ecological systems, the interconnectedness of all life forms, and the ethical implications of our actions can lead to more informed choices and advocacy for systemic changes supporting ecological health and sustainability.

In essence, relating to the more-than-human world requires a paradigm shift from anthropocentrism to a framework of ecority and stewardship in which we recognize the interconnectedness and intrinsic value of all life forms. This ontological shift will also necessitate stepping into new epistemologies, adopting practices that respect the environment, limit damage, acknowledge non-human agency, and embrace reciprocal and generative relationships.

By doing so, humans can contribute to a balanced and harmonious coexistence with the broader web of life, ensuring a sustainable and just future for all beings. Without such a shift we may well be condemning future generations to more intensive plagues, wars, and an uninhabitable planet.